Share | Contact Us | NPEC Email Alerts |
Articles Working Papers & Monographs Interviews Official Docs & Letters Op-Eds & Blogs Press Releases Presentations Audio & Video Testimony & Transcripts Translations

  
 
More of NPEC’s Work
A chronological listing by resource:

Articles | Working Papers & Monographs | Interviews | Official Docs & Letters | Op-Eds & Blogs | Press Releases | Presentations | Audio & Video | Testimony & Transcripts | Translations
 
HOME > Op-Eds & Blogs      
Op-Eds & Blogs
Jul 24, 2019 Before Saving the Planet, Could We Please Get the Bill?
Although it wasn't much noticed, last week Secretary of Energy Rick Perry played both sides of the national energy-environmental debate. America, he insisted, is driving down emissions globally by exporting natural gas and developing nuclear and renewables. What he failed to explain, however, is which of these energy options is subsidized, by how much, and who is picking up the tab. Unfortunately, our government does not keep score. As David Montgomery and I explain in our piece (below), "Before Saving the Planet, Could We Please Get the Bill?" in RealClearEnergy, we've fallen into the habit of taking an "all-of-the-above" approach. This strategy ends up pushing subsidies for virtually every energy option including some of the most uneconomical ones. In the case of nuclear energy, if frequently results in subsidies for exports of reactors -- machines that can serve as bomb starter kits. However much political sense an "all-of-the-above" strategy might make, it's rotten economics, encourages bad environmental policies, and can lead to risky nuclear exports. What we need to do instead is compare costs and choose the least expensive, most profitable ways to reduce emissions first. Towards this end, David and I make a number of recommendations. The first is to hold off on any new energy commercialization subsidies, bailouts or mandates and back away from any "national security" imperatives that cannot be quantified. It would also be helpful to have The McKinsel Company and its competitors release their latest environmental economic ranking models to help clarify what steps might reduce undesirable emissions quickest and most cheaply.
Jun 23, 2019 Only Congress Stands Between Saudi Arabia and Nuclear Weapons
A piece by NPEC Executive Director, Henry Sokolski, and NPEC Advisor, Victor Gilinsky, on selling nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia in The National Interest called "Only Congress Stands Between Saudi Arabia and Nuclear Weapons."
Jun 04, 2019 Why Congress Should Say No to Yet Another Fast Reactor Dream
A piece by NPEC Executive Director, Henry Sokolski, and NPEC Program Advisor, Victor Gilinsky on fast reactors in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists called "Why Congress Should Say No to Yet Another Fast Reactor Dream."
May 09, 2019 No One in the Sun- and Gas-Soaked Middle East Needs Nuclear Power
A piece by NPEC's Executive Director, Henry Sokolski, and Chief Executive of Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, Mark Dubowitz, in the Washington Examiner called "No one in the sun- and gas-soaked Middle East need nuclear power."
Apr 01, 2019 End Secret Nuclear Transfers to Riyadh and Beyond
Mar 25, 2019 America's Nuclear Export Controls are Fundamentally Flawed
A piece by NPEC's Executive Director, Henry Sokolski, and NPEC's Program Advisor, Victor Gilinsky, on America's nuclear exports in The National Interest called "America's Nuclear Export Controls are Fundamentally Flawed."
Feb 27, 2019 Sell Nuclear Plants to the Saudis? Are You Kidding?
A piece published by The Hill, "Sell Nuclear Plants to the Saudis? Are You Kidding?," about selling U.S. nuclear technology to Riyadh written by NPEC's Program Advisor, Victor Gilinsky, and NPEC's Executive Director, Henry Sokolski. 
Feb 06, 2019 The Rise and Demise of the Clinch River Breeder Reactor
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists publishes a new piece, "The Rise and Demise of the Clinch River Breeder Reactor," written by NPEC Executive Director, Henry Sokolski.
Feb 06, 2019 Are Washington's 'Advanced' Reactors a Nuclear Waste?
A piece published by The National Interest, "Are Washington's 'Advanced' Reactors a Nuclear Waste?," about fast reactor programs written by NPEC Program Advisor, Victor Gilinsky, and NPEC Executive Director, Henry Sokolski. 
Jan 04, 2019 If Yes to Saudi Arabia, No to Whom?
The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists publishes a new piece by NPEC's Executive Director, Henry Sokolski, and Program Advisor, Victor Gilinsky, on U.S.-Saudi nuclear issues, "If Yes to Saudi Arabia, No to Whom?" 
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18       Next> Last»
The Nonproliferation Policy Education Center (NPEC), is a 501 (c)3 nonpartisan, nonprofit, educational organization
founded in 1994 to promote a better understanding of strategic weapons proliferation issues. NPEC educates policymakers, journalists,
and university professors about proliferation threats and possible new policies and measures to meet them.
Feedback
1600 Wilson Blvd. | Suite 640 | Arlington, VA 22209 | phone: 571-970-3187 | webmaster@npolicy.org